Which commission gave the concept of neighbourhood schools

I am really impressed along with your writing skills and also with the structure for your blog. Is that this a paid topic or did you modify it your self? Either way keep up the excellent quality writing, it is uncommon to see a great weblog like this one today.. Very good info. Lucky me I discovered your website by accident stumbleupon. I have book marked it for later! I realize this is kind of off-topic but I had to ask.

Does operating a well-established website such as yours require a large amount of work? Please let me know if you have any suggestions or tips for new aspiring blog owners. Appreciate it! This is a topic which is close to my heart… Thank you! Exactly where are your contact details though? I needs to spend some time learning more or understanding more.

Awesome post. Hey I know this is off topic but I was wondering if you knew of any widgets I could add to my blog that automatically tweet my newest twitter updates. Please let me know if you run into anything. I truly enjoy reading your blog and I look forward to your new updates. Great beat! I wish to apprentice while you amend your website, how could i subscribe for a blog site? The account helped me a acceptable deal.

Inspiring quest there. What happened after? Everything is very open with a clear clarification of the issues. If Govt school will be made of higher quality and there also will be the private school ,then no common school system can be established in Bihar or elsewhere in the country because those who have more money will still send their children to the private school. Then how there will be common school system? How there will be the common facility,common standard of education and no disparity in the process of gaining education?

If private school is demolished and there is only Govt school,then the Govt school will automatically be of higher quality because the children of all leaders and bureaucrats will study in the Govt School and only due to this reason they will pay more attention to the Govt School and the condition of the Govt School will be changed in very few time.

Providing many private facilities in Indian Market is out of the principle of economics and law of market. If we take Private school for the example, they are neither following the law market,even nor following the principle of a capitalist economy. What market it is? It is not monopoly,monopolistic,oligopoly or perfect competition. It is another matter that there is higher demand and lower supply,so the price fee of private school should be higher because there is one more view of determining price in the market and the price is determined also on the type of market.

Along with large number of demand large number of students ,now a large number of suppliers Private Schools are available in the market. Private Schools are available in each street of the town and that is the large number of suppliers,so there must have been perfect competition amongst the suppliers,amongst the private schools and thus price fee should have been less due to perfect competition.

Even possessing the nature of a perfect competition market,the market is not perfect competition and determining fee arbitrarily on its own desire,as if there is monopoly. Each Private school is determining its own fee arbitrarily and establishing its own monopoly. In monopoly market,there is single supplier ,so price is determined arbitrarily but even being large number of suppliers,large number of private schools,price fee is determined arbitrarily by the these schools,as if even being in large number- possessing the nature of perfect competition,they have established its own monopoly due to lack of law and order.

Same condition is applicable for private coaching centre,private nursing home,private bus,room rent etc. An act must be passed for the removal of private schools in order to achieve the goal of common school system and in this act,in its preamble of the act,it must be mentioned that private schools are being run against the law of market and principle of economics.

Review of the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, and its relationship with common school system. Right To Education Act, the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, passed by Indian Parliament in and it is in force since 1 April with a motive to provide free elementary education to all children of the age group 6 to There is need of removing private school,instead of making children admitted in these schools on Govt Expenditure.

Section 13 of the RTE Act, provides as follows:- No capitation fee and screening procedure for admission 1 No school or person shall, while admitting a child, collect any capitation fee and subject the child or his or her parents or guardian to any screening procedure. Fee other than the school fee fee of schooling shall deemed to be capitation fee but there is no such provision.

If a child is subjected to screening procedure,then only there is the provision of fine. There is no provision of fine if a parents or guardian is subjected to screening procedure. How these fines will be imposed,what will be the process of making application for these fines,have not been mentioned in this act. Section 16 of the RTE Act, provides as follows:- Prohibition of holding back and expulsion No child admitted in a school shall be held back in any class or expelled from school till the completion of elementary education.

There is no provision of punishment if a child is held back or expelled. Then why a child will not be held back or expelled ,as there is no provision of punishment for those who holds back the child or expelled a child. Section 17 of the RTE Act, provides as follows:- Prohibition of physical punishment and mental harassment to child 1 No child shall be subjected to physical punishment or mental harassment.

Subjecting a child to physical and mental harassment is already an offence under the provisions of Indian Penal Code, Under section of the IPC for causing hurt and section 23 of the Juvenile Justice Act, But section 17 of the RTE Act, merely provides disciplinary action under the service rules applicable to such person.

Is it not the way of protecting an offender by only initiating disciplinary action against that person? Why not it is said that a person a teacher or a head teacher subjecting a child to physical and mental harassment will be liable to punishment in accordance with the section of the IPC and section 23 of the Juvenile Justice Act, along with the disciplinary action under the service rules applicable to such person?

Section 21 of the RTE Act, provides as follows:- School Management Committee 1 A school, other than a school specified in sub-clause iv of clause n of section 2, shall constitute a School Management Committee consisting of the elected representatives of the local authority, parents or guardians of children admitted in such school and teachers: Provided that atleast three — fourth of members of such Committee shall be parents or guardians: Provided further that proportionate representation shall be given to the parents or guardians of children belonging to disadvantaged group and weaker section: Provided also that fifty per cent of Members of such Committee shall be women.

Section 22 of the RTE Act, provides as follows:- School Development Plan 1 Every School Management Committee, constituted under sub-section 1 of section 21, shall prepare a School Development Plan, in such manner as may be prescribed. There is no participation of child in the school management committee. How a committee can run in a good manner without the participation of child?